Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Torres

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:56, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Torres

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No one has shown any wiki-love for this WP:BLP1E in four years even after other zombie mom cases have come forward. Clearly not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshuaism (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:59, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It's one heck of a "one event", but much of the coverage is limited to a very short period of time in 2005. If there was a page for say, women giving birth while brain dead, I'd suggest that she get a mention there but I don't know if a page exists or how we'd go about setting it up if it doesn't. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, we might be able to merge some of the information into the article for brain death, although I'd prefer if someone from one of the medical wiki-projects did a little info digging to find the other cases and general information about what goes on during all of that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:14, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this article could be expanded to include concerns about notability. She meets the two WP:BASIC criteria (multiple secondary sources), is notable for its uniqueness, and is about an issue that is quite topical. Additionally, neglected articles is not in itself a reason to delete. This article might be merged into a list of such cases at a later date, if so desired. --LT910001 (talk) 01:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.