Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susie Cornfield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Susie Cornfield

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per notability guidelines and due to a paucity of independent sources. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 17:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete no references for livign person, in current state article seems like promotional piece, although it seems likely author could pass notability test if proper research were done. 78.26 (talk) 17:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Numerous publications. Meets WP:CREATIVE. Nitalake (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 01:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unverifiable in reliable sources. Number of books written is not a criteria for inclusion. Having lots of line item listings in google books and a single weak citation in scholar (without reference to the actual book being referenced) falls short. Dennis Brown (talk) 02:34, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.