Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweethearts (music group)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:24, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sweethearts (music group)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BAND. Granted - it was part of a documentary on a television station, however, that's it. There's no further coverage on them, and there's no other claim to notability that lies within WP:BAND. Even the documentary itself (more like an interview) doesn't pass BAND. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 03:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Gong show 04:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. In addition to the The Age article and the TV series already on the page is Honeysett, Stuart (22 March 1997), "Jazz girls blow up a storm", The Australian and lots of local coverage like Linley, Margaret (22 March 1997), "Girls on tour Band stars in reality TV", The Echo - Linley, Margaret (12 September 2012), "TV focus on band `daunting'", Geelong Advertiser - "Jazz girls blow up a storm", The Echo, 19 August 2004. Enough for GNG. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:12, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I'm the author of this article and will readily admit to being a newby. I have today added some further references, trying to restrain myself from going over the top with quantity. Hopefully, I will be able to respond to the concerns of the contributors to this discussion, filling any gaps in the requirements for acceptance of articles. If the subject matter 'passes' I be looking to expand the article.Cairnsbythesea (talk) 15:47, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Coverage is sufficient to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 20:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.