Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TNS Nipo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect to Kantar TNS. As suggested by nominator and the sole commenter, this is the local branch of Kantar TNS. There is too little material, activity, and notability to justify an article on the Dutch branch. Little material should be salvable and TNS Nipo is still used as a name for the Dutch panel, hence merge and redirect are in order. Closed "as is" after there were no additional reactions to two relistings. (non-admin closure) gidonb (talk) 00:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TNS Nipo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No working links. May be the same organisation as Kantar TNS Rathfelder (talk) 10:37, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:42, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:42, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Huh, this is an interesting case. I've done a Google News search, and a lot of results come up. Most of them say that TNS Nipo is the former name for either Kantar TNS, which as you mentioned has a WP article, or Kantar Public, which does not yet exist here. If the second case is true, then we should move the article and add some reliable sources. If the first is, we should redirect the page and mention that this is the former name. Someone else probably has better knowledge on this than I do, so I'll wait for others to comment before making a decision.--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 13:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (talk) 19:26, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:49, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.