Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TWA media (non-commercial)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:12, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TWA media (non-commercial)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorialized article about a film and video production company, whose claims of notability are not reliably sourced as passing WP:CORP. As always, companies are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, but rather they need to have reliable source coverage which verifies that they pass a defined notability criterion -- but none of the sources here are support for notability at all. #1 was printed by a self-publishing print-on-demand house; #2 is just tangentially verifying a stray fact about generic film production roles in a source which isn't about this company at all; #3 is a directory entry; #4 is a general news story about a censorship controversy which fails to mention this company at all in conjunction with it; #5 is the company's own self-published website about itself; #6 is a web media startup which does not have a well-established reputation as a reliable source. Which means none of them are even relevant to getting this company over CORP criteria, and the company isn't exempted from having to get over CORP criteria just because its own web presence technically verifies that it exists. Bearcat (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Didn’t want to break any rule. I am totally OK if it’s deleted without further discussion since it seems to violate rules that I was not fully aware of. I’m sorry and will be more cautious in the future. OnSpeech (talk) 20:19, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 21:32, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No convincing sources to pass WP:CORP. Not a deletion comment, but this non-notable article can also be confused with Trans-World Airlines (TWA). AmericanAir88^(talk) 13:30, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because the subject doesn't seem notable and also fails WP:GNG.Forest90 (talk) 17:03, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.