Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T U D
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:30, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- T U D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:CORP Fiddle Faddle 18:48, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 Talk 19:20, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 Talk 19:20, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - The article has been moved to TUD (company) by another user. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - With the company's name it's hard to find sources, but even a search for "TUD Malaysia" failed to find anything relevant other than basic company information or websites mentioning/selling their products. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now as my searches found nothing convincingly good. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.