Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TactonWorks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:39, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TactonWorks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product. No indications that this product has received any in-depth independent coverage. Sources that are available all appear to be from the company itself or its vendors. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non notable product, the best sources I could find were some press releases in German and Chinese. Winner 42 Talk to me! 16:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Promotion/press release for a product that does not set itself apart from others in the eyes of the world. Hithladaeus (talk) 18:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there are no significant sources with my searches only finding this (press releases), this and this. SwisterTwister talk 16:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.