Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tag Bodyspray

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 05:10, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tag Bodyspray

Do we really want to list every new product that comes out? That's over 100,000 new products per year. I think we should wait until a product gains some notability (other than self-promotion) before we consider it encyclopedic. As a minimum, this one fails the notability test. In my view, it fails the SPAM test as well. Rklawton 02:24, 17 April 2006 (UTC) (I think we're about to see viral marketing at work...) Rklawton 03:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per above. _-M ^o P-_ 02:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The commercials are on all the time on pretty much every channel, so Id say that makes the product notable.--Pal5017 03:07, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what? There's nothing notable about a product that's advertised "all the time" Rklawton 03:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep: Product with humorous nationally-televised commercials in my face all hours of the day. Far more notable than the zillions of video games and anime-related nonsense that is poured into Wikipedia dozens at a time. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:23, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Redirect It is a project by a major manufacturer, so it could be mentioned on their page, but I don't think it should be completely deleted. FrozenPurpleCube 03:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I've seen the product mentioned and advertised over the last year in various major magazines. Perhaps not one of the most vital pages on Wikipedia, but noteable enough that it's a product by a major company with a national campaign. --Ataricodfish 03:56, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I just did a major expansion (and move), and I'm pretty sure more can happen. Jesuschex 04:30, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. You gotta be kidding me. "Do we really want to list every new product that comes out"? No, but we might want to list one that's used by probably hundreds of thousands of people now (including me on occasion) with a vast marketing campaign. Grand master ka 06:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a popular product. I can see good reasoning for it being an article :: Colin Keigher 06:44, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to be a popular or at least frequently advertised product I would assume everyone has heard of. Far more notable than many of the other things that get posted. Some guy 07:19, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable product. --Ter e nc e Ong 10:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, article has notability based on references in the article. On the other hand, I hope nobody ever starts an article about "BOD". --E lkman - ^(talk) 15:34, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Global_Gillette (or somewhere appropriate) and delete - product is not notable enough for a separate article, and not advertised outside of the US. -- mholland 16:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this product seems well-known enough to me. -- Mithent 18:59, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the rest Jordanmills 22:14, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep highly notable product. BTW, I have 3 of them in my bathroom ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 22:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A valid topic for an article because it is used widely and has many well-known advertisements. AmbExThErMaL 02:19, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:36, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.