Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taghnevan Harps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taghnevan Harps

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find significant coverage of this team. C 679 20:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Football, and Northern Ireland. C 679 20:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C 679 05:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't meet WP:CLUB or WP:GNG. I have added the only two sources I could find, which support the text, to the article. That there do not appear to be independent/reliable sources available to support even the basic facts in the text (formation date, current status, disestablishment?) suggests that SIGCOV is not met. Apart from northernirelandworld.com (a hyper-local online news sources which has perhaps a handful of match reports and other random mentions), the only coverage in "mainstream" news sources are these passing mentions in the Belfast Telegraph. Even if these two news articles dealt with the subject org as a primary topic (and they don't), it'd be difficult to argue that two (semi-regional) news articles amounted to significant coverage. That the article was created and expanded by clearly SPA/COI editors (seemingly as a form of NOTWEBHOST) is hard to overlook. Cannot support/advocate for retention. And cannot conceive of an appropriate WP:ATD. (Draft? To what end? Redirect? To where?). Hence: delete. Guliolopez (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per previous post. Hobby team. Geschichte (talk) 15:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 15:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.