Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tansuit (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy redirect. Not needed at AfD. If user keeps recreating, request protection at WP:RFPP. Malinaccier (talk) 01:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tansuit

Article was re-created following previous redirect. No reliable sources found to verify notability. Redirect is inappropriate because the subject is non-notable, also the subject (Tansuit) is an implausible misspelling of the character's actual name (Tansit). — X S G 01:16, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can't you just undo the redirect? Niteshift36 (talk) 19:10, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The issue is that there's a particular editor who keeps undoing the redirect, putting his own Original Material there. It's not vandalism, per se, but a redirect isn't a good solution either. — X S G 03:29, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:05, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy redirect and warn user (done now) about undoing the change. We just decided this at AfD and undoing the change is equivalent to recreating the material against consensus. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Material form this page was merged to the redirect so deleting is absolutely not an option - deleting would not allow for proper attribution as required by on content licenses. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The change should just have been discussed and then reverted back to the redirect. No need to use AfD when there is a clear and obvious consensus on article content. DGG (talk) 06:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:27, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re-redirect per the prior consensus. Them From Space 00:30, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.