Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Traboulsi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tanya Traboulsi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Requested by articles namesake on privacy grounds. Amortias (T)(C) 20:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question re "Requested by articles namesake on privacy grounds."
This is quite unclear.
@Amortias — is there no evidence of this from OTRS? Quis separabit? 13:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this came through an OTRS ticket. For those with access [1]. Amortias (T)(C) 19:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't have access, but I believe you. Delete, therefore. Quis separabit? 21:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: even if the bit "Requested by articles namesake on privacy grounds." is unintelligible, there is no ground to assume notability here. --Denidi (talk) 16:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete questionably notable and not a must have article that is an apparent deletion request Rainbow unicorn (talk) 17:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.