Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariqabad Flyover

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:58, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tariqabad Flyover

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this meets WP:GNG Imzadi 1979 → 23:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:51, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:51, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:03, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep most likely to be notable. Some references from independent sources like Dawn, The Express Tribune etc exist on search. Lack of references shouldn't be a reason to delete an article on an important landmark. sami ^talk 08:47, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There is no notability to pass GNG. A lack of references in an article is not reason to delete per Wikipedia:NEXIST that states "Notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate presence or citation in an article.". I did not find any such "existence" on a search, and passing or trivial does not count. Otr500 (talk) 14:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Otr500 Nightfury 11:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.