Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tequila Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 08:44, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tequila Party

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Only minimal, obscure references to the Tequlia Party by reputable sources from several years ago. No references to it from any discernible sources in the last few years. Ergo Sum 01:29, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Ergo Sum 01:34, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:47, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I found these sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] and a few more. As Ergo Sum said, most sources are from several years ago (from 2010 and 2011). Maybe it can pass the basic notability guideline, I'm not sure. --Zile (✉) 17:07, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per WP:Notability is not temporary, has enough coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:GNG imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:32, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has enough coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:GNG Lightburst (talk) 22:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As others have said, notability is not temporary. Wikipedia can contain information from the past, even if it is less relevant today. Acamicamacaraca (I hope I spelled it right) has already pointed out enough sources to satisfy WP:GNG. UnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 02:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.