Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terinu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Robert T | @ | C 02:50, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A well-written article about a good-looking webcomic... which unfortunately seems to be entirely non-notable, with an Alexa rank of 2,686,686. - Squibix 14:54, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination, sadly. - Squibix 14:54, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Once again Alexa fails. This comic has seen print and I frequently hear about it as an example of how SF comics should be done. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 15:27, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - This comic indeed has seen print. It's available in 6 shops in Australia or to buy online. I don't think it's been picked up by a major publisher by any means and is probably self published or a very small local publisher. The forums have 50 members. A google search for Terinu or Terinu comic picks up very little. But this seems to be a primarily PRINT comic, with print editions appearing before web editions. I've not voted on this one because I don't know how popular the thing is in the local area, but I would be erring on delete. - Hahnchen 19:23, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Keep per Adashiel. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 06:33, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: if this comic is notable in print, then someone should edit the article to mention that. Right now it's described as a webcomic, with no mention of any print presence at all; and as a webcomic it's clearly non-notable. Besides the alexa rank and the 50 forum members Hahnchen mentions, it also is reported to get an average of 138 views a month [1] (if thewebcomiclist.com is to be believed. - Squibix 13:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.