Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TextAloud
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Speech synthesis. MBisanz talk 04:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- TextAloud (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Was CSD'ed (incorrectly) by Graymornings, then PROD'ed by FlyingToaster (which the original author declined), so now I am bring it here - there is no assertion of notability within the article. Just PR pieces in the news, and I can't find anything asserting notability on a good scour of the web, either. — neuro(talk) 08:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Imrpvove the article. I post this on their own forum site so that Ken or Jim might improve it. --Samlaptop85213 (talk) 17:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable software, corporate spam. §FreeRangeFrog 02:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but improve - Just passing through and noticed this. I think it's a rather important piece of accessibility software for visually impaired people. I've actually been hearing of TextAloud increasingly recently as I'm part of a disability accessibility forum at work. At the very least it should be mentioned on Speech synthesis. I don't know enough about it to improve the entry, but I know of no other text-to-speech programmes by name. Mabalu (talk) 03:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.