Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Textual variants in the First Epistle of John

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 18:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Textual variants in the First Epistle of John

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the article is a copy-paste from https://www.stepbible.org/?q=version=VarApp%7Creference=1Jo.1 and https://www.stepbible.org/?q=version=VarApp%7Creference=1John.4&options=GNHVU, e.g. ἡμῶν] (our) – ‭א, B, L, Ψ, 049, 69, 88, 181, 322, 326, 436, 1067, 1175, 1241, 1409, pm, Lect, itar, itp, itt(pt),, itz, vgww, vgst, copsa, geo, Ps-Oecumeniuscomm, Theophylactcomm, TRStephens 1550, WH is on STEP Bible ἡμῶν] ‭א B L Ψ 049 69 88 181 322 326 436 1067 1175 1241 1409 pm Lect itar itp itt(pt) itz vgww vgst copsa geo Ps-Oecumeniuscomm Theophylactcomm ςStephanus WH NRtext CEI Rivtext TILC Nv NM. I do not think we should have a WP article which duplicates another website. And before one may argue that the page is to be kept because it is an important topic, I will say that almost no one works on Christianity related topics on WP so the hope of seeing the radical improvements needed are null. I add that there is already a section Textual_variants_in_the_New_Testament#First_Epistle_of_John, and I note that it has the exact same problem for it has the exact same text. Veverve (talk) 13:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Veverve (talk) 13:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bible-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Textual_variants_in_the_New_Testament#First_Epistle_of_John per nom. Not seeing a reason for a stand alone article. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this article is created as a sub-article of Textual_variants_in_the_New_Testament, to reduce the size of the main article. It would also make easier for adding materials only related to variants in 1 John. The links in the article are unique for Wikipedia, so it does not just duplicate another source. There are works being done in Christianity and Bible-related topics, but because of the large scopes, some articles may receive scarce attention. JohnThorne (talk) 21:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- We have recently had a discussion on Textual variants in the New Testament and a related article, tackling the subject in a different way. I think that on the whole this is a subject best tackled one book at a time, or in small groups (perhaps the 3 epistles of John together. Thus splitting that article is a worthwhile endeavour. It is desirable that minor differences in spellings are ignored unless they make a significant difference to the meaning, but the difference between our and your would not be merely minor. I might have liked to see some discussion of how much difference some of the variant readings make to the meaning. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.