Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thanatonic nihilism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:05, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanatonic nihilism

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD This is a term which is not used in philosophy sources as far as I have seen, certainly the sources cited don't use it. It seems to be original research or at least synth, and I think it was a very interesting read but probably the wrong forum. I found one use of it in a psychoanalysis journal- I don't have the full text to link to, but the name of the article is 'Anal sexuality and male subcultures online: The politics of self-deprecation in the deep vernacular web'. Overall, this is not a term used in reliable sources and this article is synthesis, drawing from poetry and philosophy to introduce this term. An IP editor also noted this in the page history. JohnmgKing (talk) 19:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. JohnmgKing (talk) 19:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:MADEUP - This is very clearly nothing, even accounting for the misspelling in the typo, "thanatotic nihilism" gets no results from jstor and only two in google scholar. It's unclear why anyone would WP:RFUD this, it shows a complete lack of judgement. - car chasm (talk) 01:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable neologism (t · c) buidhe 07:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Complete junk with no redeeming features. Neologism. scope_creep^Talk 05:09, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.