Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That's What I Call StarKid! Volume 2
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:15, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That's What I Call StarKid! Volume 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One of a cluster of non-notable albums from non-notable company, which has its own template Orange Mike | Talk 01:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:02, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Let's move this discussion to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarKid Productions. There was no reason to start deleting all the pages before first discussing the main article. Eladkse (talk) 06:02, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with the Eladkse--Mimi C. (talk) 09:18, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the main discussion was to keep. An admin may now close this, as the original reason is now invalid. Eladkse (talk) 15:57, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No sign of independent notability, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 22:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:35, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Each StarKid Productions album has a separate wiki article. I don't see why this one would be treated any differently.--Mimi C. (talk) 21:37, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable album. No WP:RS. Also, notability is not inherited. Ishdarian 03:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:43, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't see evidence that WP:NALBUMS is met. I refer Eladkse to WP:NOTINHERITED, as albums/songs must be proven to have notability in their own right. I also refer Mimi C. to WP:OTHERSTUFF as the presence of multiple similar existing articles has no bearing on this AFD - maybe the other articles need to be deleted too. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 13:03, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.