Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Arsonist (Deadlock album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. It might be worth considering a merge, as User:Gongshow suggests. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 11:23, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Arsonist (Deadlock album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable album by a non-notable band. No references cited. PROD and maintenance tags were removed without explanation. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 01:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 01:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No, it's not. It's a charting album released via one of the bigger labels of the genre (Napalm Records). I'm not a fan of such stubs, but that's a different story. --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 11:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I'm not finding much, but a Sputnikmusic staff review [1] (considered reliable here) to go with shorter pieces at Metal Hammer [2] and Revolver [3] might just (or might not, YMMV) be enough material to support an article. If not, a merge into Deadlock (metal band)#Line up changes and sixth album (2011-) would be appropriate. Gong show 20:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 22:11, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Don't think this qualifies under WP:NALBUM - the rather short album reviews don't seem to be significant enough coverage to justify its own article. Hardly any information beyond a track listing. Band's page I think would be sufficient to cover the album. mikeman67 (talk) 18:28, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.