Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bible In 30 Minutes ... Or Less!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Moved to User:SchnitzelMannGreek/The Bible In 30 Minutes ... Or Less! per WP:SNOW and WP:USERFY. Knight-Lord of the Infernal Penguins 17:39, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Bible In 30 Minutes ... Or Less!

Contested prod. Non-notable play. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've been in church plays. Small groups of people writing fiction is fun, but not always noteable for Wikipedia. Delete Lots42 (talk) 01:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an actual and notable play especially in christain schools. Many of them preform this each year. Please don't delete...some people like students may use this article as a reference. I don't see why delete this. It is a notable play with igood intention...esp. among the private christain schools. God...please reconsider deletion.

God BlessSchnitzelMannGreek (talk) 01:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a "small group of people writing fiction" or small church play. A recent production happened at Christain Heritage Academy in Jacksonville Florida and it was even advertized in the Omni hotel and on Comcast. Definately worth wikipedia.SchnitzelMannGreek (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, its one of my first articles of the kind. Please don't delete...I worked hard on this...pardon it for the above reason as well.(This isn't a "small group of people writing fiction" or small church play. A recent production happened at Christain Heritage Academy in Jacksonville Florida and it was even advertized in the Omni hotel and on Comcast. Definately worth wikipedia)SchnitzelMannGreek (talk) 01:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC)I BEG..please..for God..don't delete thisSchnitzelMannGreek (talk) 01:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again-.not small groups of people writing fiction. KeepUser:SchnitzelMannGreek 01:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete absolutely not notable. Should have been speedy, no assertion of importance or significance. Drawn Some (talk) 01:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep still confused...why not notable? This isn't a "small group of people writing fiction" or small church play. A recent production happened at Christain Heritage Academy in Jacksonville Florida and it was even advertized in the Omni hotel and on Comcast. Definately worth wikipedia)User:SchnitzelMannGreek 01:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why not notable? Please show us a reliable source (click here to see what we mean by that) that will establish the play's notability. If you are still unclear about what a reliable source is, let me put it this way: if the play's producer can get anything changed in a source without talking to his attorney, then that source is probably not reliable. So that would exclude the aforementioned ads, on the grounds that they are... ads. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:31, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Look at the sites on the article's references.User:SchnitzelMannGreek 01:34, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Those are just repositories. They do not assert a play's notability. They merely assert its existence. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:40, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So, what's going to happen now?User:SchnitzelMannGreek 01:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well we could always keep the article and add it to Category:Wikipedia humor. Maybe after a few tweaks....--The Legendary Sky Attacker 02:23, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
LOL!User:SchnitzelMannGreek 02:31, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think we should call it a day and keep the article. Afterall, someone might find it helpful...you never know.User:SchnitzelMannGreek 02:33, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indications that the play is notable, no third party sources, and thinking something might be useful is not a good reason to keep it. TJ Spyke 03:27, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless someone can provide sources. All I have found on it is a couple of school and church productions. --Susan118 (talk) 03:49, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:N. Iowateen (talk) 05:36, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No one is arguing if this play exists or not but it clearly does not satisfy WP:N, there are no reliable sources, everything is a primary source. This should be deleted. It would be better off in some churches local site, not here on wikipedia. meshach (talk) 05:40, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No independent sources have been provided; the only sources cited are from the play publisher's own web site. There are a few Google hits but most of them appear to just be announcements of local productions of the play. There would need to be some independent sources that discuss the play in some detail before the article would deserve to be kept. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:44, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.