Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Calcutta Quran Petition (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 10:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Calcutta Quran Petition

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A self published book by author owned publishing company, lacking third party RS coverage and critical reviews. Fails all the criteria of WP:BOOKCRIT. Article largely unsourced or linked to other self published sources. Some refs are discussing the incident, not the book. Tagged for notability issue for a month. Walrus Ji (talk) 15:47, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 15:47, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 15:47, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 15:47, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was no consensus. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previous discussions: 2011-08 no consensus

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given a lack of further comment.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tentative Keep as the book (or the chain of events itself) looks to be notable. There may not be ready references available online as it happened in 1980s India. However, the article contains important information and I cannot think of a reason to delete it. The book seems to be there in quite a few libraries. Although religious conflicts are common in India, it is relatively uncommon in West Bengal compared to other states. This book/event seems to be a contrary example. At the moment, I would prefer to keep the article. Edit: I found a reference. There is also a mention here, but I cannot download the pdf.--DreamLinker (talk) 00:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.