Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chronicles of Hugh de Singleton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- Cirt (talk) 05:30, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Chronicles of Hugh de Singleton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing here to pass WP:BOOK. JaGa^talk 20:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I did find one significant article in a Michigan newspaper about this book series and its author.[1]. I'm doubtful that this by itself is enough to show notability, but if there are some reviews in reliable sources that might change.--Arxiloxos (talk) 04:46, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Moderately successful mystery series: the first 2 books are in about 175 WorldCat libraries each; the third is just being published. I would normally suggest merging into an article for the author, but her seems to have written nothing else. Still checking for reviews. DGG ( talk ) 05:16, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular ^talk 21:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keepe - they hath existeth in many a library across the world knowne and unknowne, seene and on some unknowne thinge called ye Internete. Bearian (talk) 12:58, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.