Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Civic Culture
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser TSU 00:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The Civic Culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK Curb Chain (talk) 05:06, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I'm not quite finished looking for sources, partially because there's just so many of them. From what I've discovered, this book is quite heavily discussed in political science classes at multiple levels of education, so it easily passes part 4 of WP:NBOOK and by extension, part 1. If anyone coming in after this is a poli-sci wiz, I'd appreciate someone with a little more experience in the subject adding to the article.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:09, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep or nom should be withdrawn. Also, should have PRODed first. Meets #1 WP:NBOOK. See reflist. See also multiple reviews, and scholarly coverage and citations of it. --Lexein (talk) 16:04, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Eh, no big worries. The initial state of the article was pretty bad and this did get the article some much needed TLC.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 03:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.