Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Football-Weekly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The Football-Weekly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested Prod. Prod reason was "No evidence that this programme meets the notability guidelines." which remains the case, hence bringing this to AfD AllyD (talk) 20:12, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 19:03, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm sure the top podcasts in the world deserve articles, but by the looks of things, this isn't one of them. PhnomPencil talk contribs 02:03, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing to suggest notability. NapHit (talk) 11:59, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:GNG -Rushyo Talk 13:54, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable podcast. SL93 (talk) 19:43, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as having insufficient coverage in independent third-party sources. If such sources are integrated into the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:19, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.