Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Friend of Mankind
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 00:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The Friend of Mankind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This seems to be an online video that was put together mainly using footage from existing TV programs. It has been tagged as non-notable and then proposed for deletion without anyone adding any references to show that it is more notable than any other video on YouTube. Steve Dufour 02:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- Non-fiction documentary film, sources will be added in the future from citations to expand upon the article. Smee 02:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- The article is 10 months old. Steve Dufour 02:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Nevertheless, the article will be expanded upon, in the process of finding some more sources. Smee 02:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- If it is truly notable then you can recreate it. For now, it is a nothing and should be deleted. --Justanother 04:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Nevertheless, the article will be expanded upon, in the process of finding some more sources. Smee 02:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTFILM. The film needs significant coverage from reliable sources. I don't think Youtube would satisfy the first half of criteria 1 being the film has been widely distributed; even then criteria 1 still requires two film reviews. --Bren talk 04:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom & WP:NOTFILM. --Evb-wiki 04:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Evb-wiki --Justanother 04:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTFILM. I can't find any reviews of it. Aleta 02:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. References to the film's popularity are actually just links to the film posted on various sites, not reliable secondary (or even primary) sources. Mangojuicetalk 12:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.