Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The MonsterJunkies (novel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The MonsterJunkies (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Although there is a Wikipedia article on the author of this book, the book itself doesn't seem to have generated any scholarly response, and hasn been talked about in reliable third-party sources. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:44, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no sign of notability. That there is an article on the author isn't even any help, as that article is itself created by the same editor as this one, and is built on puffery and problematic sources, and is a reasonable candidate for deletion. --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:53, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If notability can be established for the author then I would support a redirect, otherwise delete. There is some assertion of notability for him, assuming the claims of him winning a Telly Award (among others) for a show he created (Reptile Chronicles) is correct. If that can be verified, then that could establish notability, but until I actually see that he received the award I'll be skeptical. I admit that if that's all he's known for, it would probably be more appropriate to create an article for the show and redirect there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.