Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mountain Is You
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Brianna Wiest. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Mountain Is You (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NBOOK. Google gives no indication that the book had any significant coverage: only related coverage on Google News is primary-source Medium article. ‒overthrows 21:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. ‒overthrows 21:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 14:57, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 14:57, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - I can find no coverage whatsoever about this book in reliable sources. The referencing in the article is to the book itself which is about as primary as it gets. -- Whpq (talk) 00:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:42, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:42, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Brianna Wiest. I agree that this book doesn't seem to have received any substantial coverage from reliable sources; it fails WP:NBOOK. Redirecting to the author seems like a reasonable WP:ATD, if nothing else per WP:CHEAP. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect as per Extraordinary Writ. Sam Mehrab (talk) 23:43, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect per Extraordinary Writ.4meter4 (talk) 00:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.