Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nemesis Theory (band)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The Nemesis Theory (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band. No references are provided, and I could find none. No records on notable labels, no notable tours or members, etc. Drmies (talk) 19:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I found this. There are some local Seattle mentions, but not much.--Milowent • talkblp-r 19:46, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow. Who is that dude channeling? Rob Halford? Drmies (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable band. Lack of substantial coverage in reliable sources. Three years old and no references section. Christopher Connor (talk) 00:35, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.