Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Profits of Extermination

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Exterminated. slakr^\ talk / 04:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Profits of Extermination

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication at all of anything notable about this book, as required by WP:BK. No sources on page either. mikeman67 (talk) 07:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I found where it's used in a piece by SOAW, but so far the pickings are a little slim. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've still yet to find reviews, but it's cited as a reference in a ton of various academic type texts. ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe we could create a page for the author and redirect there? Assuming we can find sources, of course. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete GS shows very few citations. Unless book reviews in major publications crop up, this does not meet any notability guideline. --Randykitty (talk) 19:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.