Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The SecDev Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The SecDev Group

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references don’t suggest notability, it fails WP:CORP most of the contributors have been WP:SPA. Devokewater ^(talk) 15:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Devokewater ^(talk) 15:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Devokewater ^(talk) 15:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Devokewater ^(talk) 15:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.