Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Storm Runner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Storm Runner

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence of notability . Non notable author, almost entirely description of plot, one extremely minor review DGG ( talk ) 01:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disney-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 19:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Meets WP:NBOOK ie multiple reviews, reviews by Kirkus (here), BookTrust (here), The Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books (here), School Library Journal and Booklist (here). Coolabahapple (talk) 13:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - The reviews provided by Coolabahapple above are all rather on the brief side, and in some cases are little more than plot summaries, but altogether I think does push this book into passing WP:NBOOK. Even if people disagree, though, deletion would still be inappropriate, as a redirect to Rick Riordan Presents, the franchise it belongs to, would be the proper WP:ATD. Rorshacma (talk) 15:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NBOOK. CleanAmbassy (talk) 02:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per identified reviews. — Toughpigs (talk) 19:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Coolabahapple's comment. Just to need those reviews into article. --Gazal world (talk) 20:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.