Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Thirst

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn --JForget 00:44, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Thirst

Non-notable. Article only has one source meaning poor reliability. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 17:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Tenacious D Fan (talk) 17:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a single criteria of WP:MUSIC is matched. IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 19:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC Keep more than enough to pass WP:MUSIC#C1. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 01:50, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. A quick Google search (which should always be a minimum effort before nominating for deletion) brings back all these: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. How much coverage do you want?--Michig (talk) 18:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now worked these into the article, and also added sourced mentions of their appearance at the SXSW festival and their live session on BBC 6 Music. There's no way this should be deleted.--Michig (talk) 20:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:RS. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw per research by Michig. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 12:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.