Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Three 4 Tens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 09:17, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Three 4 Tens

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

They don't meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 19:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:55, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes criteria 1 of WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG based on the sources already in the article. A staff written bio in AllMusic, multiple album reviews in both AllMusic and Pitchfork, and an in depth article in the Philadelphia City Paper is all quality RS to meet these guidelines. Further, there is likely much more press in publications like The Philadelphia Inquirer for those who have subscription access to their archives to find. Not sure why this was nominated. The notability tag could have probably been just removed if one bothered to look at the sources.4meter4 (talk) 18:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:50, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified above such Pitchfork, AllMusic, Philadelphia City Paper and others referenced in the article that show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:09, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.