Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Three Bogatyrs on Distant Shores

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Three Bogatyrs. Sandstein 14:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Three Bogatyrs on Distant Shores

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page is irrelevant as there is already an adequate section on this film in The_Three_Bogatyrs See: The_Three_Bogatyrs#The_Three_Bogatyrs_on_Distant_Shores_.282012.29 Parkywiki (talk) 01:16, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I edited it well now, and I don`t think it should be deleted.Thanks--CARROT4231 (talk) 19:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC)--CARROT4231 (talk) 19:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
— Note to closing admin: CARROT4231 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I linked this with the Russian Wikipedia's page and I found this site, which looks to be about the equivalent of Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic, as it collects critic reviews from very specific outlets, which are listed here. I don't know how discerning they are, but if they're similar to either of the aforementioned two, then the reviews here (seven of them) could help establish notability. I'll ask the Russia WP to help out. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I also found this review and this one. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:17, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Three Bogatyrs. Almost all plot summary and unreferenced. No need for standalone article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:53, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.