Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Visitor (TV series)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. howcheng {chat} 17:31, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, this is a forgotten television series which only existed for one season on the Fox network. Althought I remember it, most people never heard of it. Plus I want to test this AfD thing. Roman Soldier 20:42, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- As you are the only author of the page, asking for it to be deleted I think it can be marked as speedy delete --Petros471 20:44, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Since this was a real show on network TV why delete? -- JJay 21:00, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand based on excellent comments below. -- JJay 22:17, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- comment quoting nominator... "forgotten television series...existed for one season...Fox...most people never heard of it", same statements can be used to describe Firefly, which became Serenity...FYI J\/\/estbrook 21:06, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This program was a classic - though short lived. It has plenty of webpages devoted to it. And it is regularily still aired around the world; it's certainly not forgotten! There's a (very incomplete) list of world-wide airings over the last eight years. Really the page needs to be expanded! Nfitz 22:14, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I too enjoyed the series, and it was one of the first hour long shows I had ever had the attention span for, but I don't know if it is notable enough for Wikipedia. Although many short lived television shows develop cult followings, this one doesn't appear to have one. Roman Soldier 22:45, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I've made a small edit now now the proposer is not the only author. We probably need to do some disambiguation here. DJ Clayworth 22:47, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm willing to withdraw my nomination if we can get some more material on the page about the series. Anyone else who can remember this series from so long ago please correct my work.
- Keep — I remember this series. The article could use a little cleanup. — RJH 21:09, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I know that this television series has been the subject of independently sourced published works. I searched for and read a few of them a year or so ago when I was trying to find out what the series was actually about. ☺ People have even considered it notable enough to have written and published additional episodes of their own. Keep. Uncle G 23:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep verifiable redstucco 09:49, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, no reason this should not be on Wikipedia. Stifle 02:12, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.