Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/They Came Back
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep, nominator is obviously trolling.--SB | T 17:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:FILM on almost all levels, rundown listed below. NuclearUmpf 16:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In general a film is notable if it meets one or more of the following criteria:
- The film has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the film and its creators/producers.
- This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and full-length magazine reviews except for the following:
- Only one review provided in web based magazine. Slant magazine [1]
- The film has been theatrically released nationwide in a country, or into 200 or more commercial theaters.
- Per IMDB release information [2] it has not been.
- The film has received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
- No awards issued
- The film is a full length film released by a major studio.
- Has not been
- Delete - Per my own nom. --NuclearUmpf 16:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.