Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Force (Electrodynamics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 18:39, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Third Force (Electrodynamics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Suspect nonsense. Imaginatorium (talk) 09:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not nonsense but describes true physical phenomenon as published in the reference. Please do not make opinions if you are not Physics expert. Prof. in Theoretical Physics. --Mattedia (talk) 09:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously doubt you are a professor. This is original research, pure and simple, with a citation that does not back the claim. You've spent your time on wikipedia consistently pushing incoherent pseudoscience and promotional material for one idea and one person. Second Quantization (talk) 12:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is neither pseudoscience or original research. The effect formula is strictly rewritten from the US peer reviewed journal Physical Review A and the main author is from one of the best US universities operating hot fusion laser laboratory. --Mattedia (talk) 08:02, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:OR. The only cited source (Btw a malformatted reference to Phys. Rev. A) doesn't mention the topic. Finding other references is difficult since it doesn't get very clear what the article is about. — HHHIPPO 21:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as crankery. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete WP:OR. Term does not exist. Second Quantization (talk) 20:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.