Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Delany

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Slightly early close as there are questions about the nomination and zero chance this would be deleted. StarM 17:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Delany

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN. –Cupper52^Discuss! 19:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. –Cupper52^Discuss! 19:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. –Cupper52^Discuss! 19:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He passes WP:NPOL, as he has been a member of a legislative body at the national level. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 09:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Obviously passes WP:NPOLITICIAN. This is not the first time that I have had to correct the nominator's assertion that a subject fails that guideline when he clearly passes. It's fine to make mistakes, but they shouldn't be repeated after they have been pointed out. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - although consensus can change, it's well-established that parliamentarians are automatically notable. Bearian (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Clearly and obviously passes WP:NPOLITICIAN. Did the proposer even read the guidelines? It reads - "Politicians and judges who have held international, national office" - Seanad Éireann (Irish Senate) is the upper house of the Irish parliament. A quick 2 min search would have shown this. WP:TROUT for you! Spleodrach (talk) 12:59, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and please take action against the nominator: The nominator is just simply nominating the articles for deletion. He is not following WP:Before. Please see these two discussions. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Guruvayur_Padmanabhan and https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kongad_Kuttisankaran#Kongad_Kuttisankaran . Both are bad nominations along with this one. I request the administrator to take action against the nominator. Because he has been warned 4 times, but is not stopping this action. Thankyou Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 16:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Article does need some referencing improvement, so by all means tag it for {{refimprove}}, but having verifiably served in the Oireachtas is a clear and unequivocal pass of WP:NPOL #1. Bearcat (talk) 16:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.