Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thompson & Knight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thompson & Knight

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches are literally finding nothing of actual substance, significance and convincing and that's not surprising considering it's only 1 company and whose environment is only going to consist of advertising, this shows based from my searches which only listed PR and republished PR, certainly nothing acceptable therefore all we have is a explosive advertisement with nothing else to suggest meaningful improvements (I'll note the article has been somewhat heavily contributed to by the company itself, one of them the literal "Thompsonknight" account). SwisterTwister talk 18:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete I'm finding slight coverage in legal press of employee movements (and most of those are press release reprints), but that's about it and I'm not sure there's an article worth having in it. This RS suggests it's possible, and I'm willing to be convinced - David Gerard (talk) 10:59, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corporate spam. With sections on "Offices" and "Diversity Efforts", this is about 100% certain to have been the result of paid editing. No value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 10:40, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 10:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.