Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thou Art That (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G3) by Backslash Forwardslash. Non-admin closure. MuZemike 23:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thou Art That (band)

Other than their myspace page, I can not find any mention of this band or any of the titles listed in the discography section of the article. There is a list of references but I can not work out what they refer to, and so are opening up a discussion as there may very well be something I missed in my searches. Sixtysixstar (talk) 20:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as hoax or unverifiable. Being obscure is no sin around here, but this is unverifiable in the extreme. I call hoax on this one; some of their weirder album names ("Eight-Legged Ways of Satan", "Rampage Of The Sasquatch") bring up only wikipedia and wiki mirrors. Hairhorn (talk) 20:32, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I could not find any evidence of notability. Dawn Bard (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
G3 per hairhorn. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:49, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
G3 per above. Tim meh !_{(review me)} 21:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:31, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.