Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Paulsen (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:43, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tiffany Paulsen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this was kept in an AFD discussion back in 2006, both WP:NPOL and our reliable sourcing rules have evolved significantly since then, and this no longer meets contemporary standards. Her notability remains limited to a city council seat in a city not large enough to confer an automatic NPOL pass on its city councillors, and a non-winning candidacy for higher office — and the only actual source here is a deadlinked article which is actually about somebody else who later outyouthed her "youngest person ever elected to council" claim, which means that the article doesn't pass WP:GNG in lieu of failing NPOL, because it isn't sourced to any RS coverage of Paulsen. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 17:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per Bearcat -- my sweeps didn't find enough to meet the WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - She's done nothing notable except gain political office. This office is not notable enough to satisfy notability, evidenced by the fact that only one other councillor of equal standing has an article. Rayman60 (talk) 21:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Relatively unremarkable post, and otherwise fails WP:GNG, as per nominator. JTtheOG (talk) 05:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.