Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger penis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 15:38, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger penis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's nothing sourced here, and what is here could be merged into Pizzle or traditional Chinese medicine easily. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:25, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect to Tiger#Traditional Asian medicine. Seems like most of this info is already there. I think you're right that it might have a place in Pizzle as well, though. Zujua (talk) 06:16, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep separately, as there's enough material and a good chance to write about this specific topic ([1], [2]). The article has potential. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 06:41, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Ref now included. --Ipigott (talk) 08:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've restored two previously deleted referenced sections, see [3] [4]. @nominator: when nominating an article at AfD, please, don't forget to check also the article's history. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sadly this edit took nearly a year to be reverted. I should have put this on my watchlist. Tiger penis and Deer penis are notable in Asia in their own right.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:45, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sourced article establishes topic importance and the availability of separate independent reliable sources. --LauraHale (talk) 12:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn I'm chalking this up to an "oops" moment. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:22, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I clicked "edit" before I read the withdrawal above, but since I'm here already, it definitely passes notability tests.--William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 03:35, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.