Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tilson Lake Trail
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge/Redirect Consensus seems to favor merger, agree as nominator. (non-admin close) Beeblebrox (talk) 23:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tilson Lake Trail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No evidence of notability, Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Beeblebrox (talk) 20:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - With Riding Mountain National Park. Raitchison (talk) 21:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge this article doesn't meet notability standards. Pstanton 21:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pstanton (talk • contribs)
- Merge or userfy per above, don't delete. travb (talk) 03:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. See my comment at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Newfoundland_Trail, immediately below in today's log. Deor (talk) 03:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. As above, see my comment at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Newfoundland_Trail. --Zachdegner (talk) 05:11, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I can see creator User:Zachdegner is making a good faith effort to make this article a good quality article for wikipedia.travb (talk) 16:36, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to appropriate target. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with gratitude to Zachdegner. I have added the trail article to the larger article at Riding Mountain National Park... essentially a pre-emptive merge. This is where readers might expect to find it. Nice job. I have used the pemican.org article as a referenced source and did not simply "copy" the information. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 18:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.