Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Nibbana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per CSD G5 (non-admin closure) -- Kethrus |talk to me

Tina Nibbana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability claimed but not demonstrated. Much of the material available online is from Amazon, blogs, social media and the like. Aside from the fact that the article reads like an advertisement, I do not believe that the subject satisfies WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. Super Mario Man ( talk ) 18:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and NARTIST. I could find nothing of substance about the subject. The article creator improperly removed a {{blpprod}} I had placed earlier when there were no sources at all [1]. Still not even one reliable source in the article. Jbh ^Talk 19:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 19:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 19:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 19:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, the claim of being "considered one of Americas best portrait photographers" is clearly false. There's no news articles on her at all (as far as I can see). -- Kethrus |talk to me 17:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: could be a G11. Speedy deleted multiple times from eswiki going back to 2010. Vrac (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.