Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titans (Warcraft)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is a Secret ^account 01:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Titans (Warcraft)

Please note that I do not nominate these articles together due to a previous trainwreck. It would be appreciated that you do NOT merge these Articles for deletions together, as the previous decision was to decide on the values of each article separately.

As there is a huge majority of articles that need to go through an AfD (literally over 100), the reasons listed may not be as relevant to this article as it would be another. Either way, they all appear to have the same problems and still must be noted to make a decision.

This characters article appears to comprised of unsourced, unnotable, fancruft.

This article has little to no third-party sources, with usually the only source being on another wiki, a gaming site, or the Blizzard website.

This article is also not notable to non-Warcraft players, as chances are, a complete stranger to the series would not read this article at all, failing real-world notability.

Finally, this article is most likely fancruft, possibly created through original research. These are mostly unwelcome, continuing on the basis that non-players would have no interest in it.

This article is nominated individually to prevent another trainwreck from occurring while also allowing editors to individually decide which article should stay and which should go. The above reasons are as to why each of these articles should be deleted, whether they are completely relevant or hardly relevant. IAmSasori 21:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

merge all into one massive Warcraft NPC article. It's no worse than other fancruft all over Wikipedia if it's consolidated. This vote goes for all the AfDs posted by IAmSasori that say "do not merge" but I'm far too lazy to post this in all the AfDs. Hansonc 22:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete violates WP:Plot and WP:OR, while the game Warcraft is notable. The fiction and characters within it are not. Ridernyc 22:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as appropriate, Keep as appropriate (i.e., if notable and supported). Was it really necessary to create some 40+ different AfDs when many during the combined AfD suggested either a keep or a merge? Surely simply relying on that is better than spamming AfD 40+ times? Consider this a keep/merge vote for each of these related 40+ AfDs; I certainly won't dignify spam with posting in each one. --Sesameball^Talk 23:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on unencyclopaedic status. Bobby1011 06:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per all the other !votes I've made in the warcruft AfDs. Fails WP:FICT, unlikely secondary sources can be found to establish notability, and violates WP:NOT#PLOT. Doctorfluffy 05:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.