Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Fulp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nominator blocked. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 02:02, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Fulp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While Newgrounds might be notable, that does not make members of it's staff any same. URBAN-ANDY (talk) 22:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT DELETE If Tom Fulp isn't notable then Newgrounds isn't either!!!111 68.221.220.223 (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk declined It's notable. He is actively listed on the newgrounds website, is accessible as a easter egg for some reasons. --FA
IL!
^Talk 23:05, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — Nominator has been blocked as a sock; no opinion on Tom Fulp, which I've not even looked at. Jack Merridew 23:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Fulp is both a famous programmer, and the owner/administrator of an extremely popular website. Some of his notoriety is from his work on the console games Alien Hominid and Castle Crashers, while the majority of it is from his website, Newgrounds. He is definitely a notable person, worthy of an article. -Rob^talk 03:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note - this article has been boldly merged and redirected to Newgrounds by User:Computer97. I support keeping the content on that page - there's not really enough to justify a separate article - however, the redirect should be kept as well for GFDL reasons. Meanwhile, this AFD should probably be speedy-closed as a nomination by a banned user. Robofish (talk) 15:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.