Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Tetuila

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Notability has been proven although it does need some cleaning, The Delete !vote makes no sense so discounting that here, Cheers (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 19:42, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Tetuila

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Article Does not meet Wikipedia Guidelines there is No Evidence of Notability on this Article --Samat lib (talk) 23:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I fixed the nom. ansh 666 09:51, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He's pretty well known in Nigeria - just do a search in news or books. Meets several criteria in WP:MUSICBIO. The article should be expanded not deleted. -- haminoon (talk) 08:09, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:- Subject of the article is one of the pioneers of Hip pop music in Nigeria. In addition, I found, Vanguard News, Channels Television News, Vanguard News, World Public Library, Jaguda News, News Punch, Nigeria films, Vanguard News The Punch Newspaper, ereporter, Thenet, News Africa Now, Nigeria Headlines, Tribune News, Thisdaylive News, Bella Naija, Thisdaylive News, Spy Ghana, Thisdaylive News and Daily Independent News to mention few. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recommendation. I recommend the speedy close of this discussion in good faith by any patrolling admin as it serve no other purpose than to waste the precious time of other editors. Moreover, the subject notability had been established by the multiple reliable sources provided above. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this very Article need a total Clean up ,

adding more reliable multiple sources on the Article main page to prove is Notability , Secondly if this problem is not fixed fast * Delete Kokobenin (talk) 10:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Needs cleanup, but they are notable enough. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:14, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.