Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traffline
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. But please use less colorful language in future nominations. Haukur (talk) 10:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Traffline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
another startup baby crying with funding. funding and more funding. there is nothing to write about this one and non-notable enough for now. Intentions and purpose are clearly to make wiki presence. Light2021 (talk) 22:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:27, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:27, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. fails NCORP. DMySon 18:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- weak delete Few references are there which are notable, but as of now seems a case of too soon Sv72 (talk) 01:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 15:41, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.