Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Training for Utopia / Zao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Training for Utopia / Zao

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable split EP. The HM Magazine review is a few sentences long and seems to comprise the extent of independent coverage. Because the album is a split, there is no clear target for the standard redirect-to-artist procedure. Skeletor3000 (talk) 22:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 22:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 22:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 22:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 22:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment HM is the primary source for Christian metal and extreme music at this time. That they also have a one-line review in AllMusic is impressive. The work gets a one-sentence mention in the Training for Utopia entry in Powell, Mark Allan (2002). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Christian Music. Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishers. p. 959. ISBN 1-56563-679-1., but it's not mentioned in the Zao entry. I don't see the article expanding beyond the stub it is now and can't really support its inclusion on the project, but I won't make a !vote for its deletion either. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, qedk (t 桜 c) 11:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I could not locate enough coverage from third-party, reliable sources to support WP:GNG. Since this EP was released by two artists, I do not believe there is a clear redirect target. Aoba47 (talk) 02:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, significant coverage not found. b uidhe 02:50, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.