Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transzap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Transzap

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guideline for companies. All sources I could find are either connected to Transzap itself or trivial mentions specifically excluded by NCORP as a factor in notability (e.g. the Fast 500 lists). – Teratix ₵ 00:40, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 00:40, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 00:40, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 00:40, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG. All I could find were a 2003 wanted ad and a mention of the merge with Enverus. Any other information comes from primary sources or brief profiles such as this one. All of the March 2011 sources on the page either generate a 404 error or do not load. Heartmusic678 (talk) 16:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agreed, not every "three kids and an app" is notable. The current article seems from a burst in 2011 by single-purpose account Special:Contributions/Cogolfcritic who did no more edits in the past ten years. This one was never updated about its apparent demise in 2018. More circumstantial evidence is the use of marketing language like "solutions", being founded by "veterans", buzzwords like "EPayables", etc. and the use of non-USA day-month-year dates for a subject based in the USA. Perhaps a combined article on this company, its "Olidex" and "Drillinginfo" brands, and the resulting parent company, but see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enverus which discussed another fishy article from 2019. Also seems to now be owned by Hellman & Friedman so if anything, might get a mention there at most. W Nowicki (talk) 19:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant coverage to pass WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.